Forum The Longship RB room looks mighty empty right now...

RB room looks mighty empty right now...

purplefaithful
Joined May 2013
3,478 posts
Rep: 4,143

They are going to have to add some bodies.

Hurry-up Vikings, we ain't getting any younger! 

#1 · Aug 28, 3:43 AM
AGRforever
Joined Sep 2014
535 posts
Rep: 610

I'll take one for the team. What's the vet minimum again? Do I need to make it past one play?

#2 · Aug 28, 3:45 AM
BI
Joined Apr 2018
61 posts
Rep: 86
StickierBuns wrote:
I wouldn't say empty, I really like both Jones and Chandler....even Ham. The #3 RB gets very little use....VERY little. There's obviously a strategy here and like you mention, they'll sign someone here soon. Its not a concern for me.

Yep. In each of KOC's two seasons the Vikings have ranked 28th in number of rushing attempts. The three years he was an OC  his teams ranked 24th, 7th and 31st in attempts. The year he actually ran the ball there wasn't one work horse Akers had 145 carries, Henderson 138 and Brown 101.

#3 · Aug 28, 5:39 AM
JR44
Joined Aug 2017
603 posts
Rep: 840

I have a feeling they may be waiting for practice squads to be full, before announcing a new RB signing, which they will then need to release a current player on the 53 who I am sure they will want to make sure they get on the PS. Gaskin has been added to the PS, but they are going to want 3 on the 53.

#4 · Aug 28, 5:58 AM
KN
Joined Jan 2021
198 posts
Rep: 207
bigbone62 wrote:

Yep. In each of KOC's two seasons the Vikings have ranked 28th in number of rushing attempts. The three years he was an OC  his teams ranked 24th, 7th and 31st in attempts. The year he actually ran the ball there wasn't one work horse Akers had 145 carries, Henderson 138 and Brown 101.

Wonder if the ratio will swing toward more rush attempts now that we've swapped out Kirko for Sam.

#5 · Aug 28, 6:16 AM
BI
Joined Apr 2018
61 posts
Rep: 86
Knucklehead wrote:

Wonder if the ratio will swing toward more rush attempts now that we've swapped out Kirko for Sam.

 I would hope the GM/HC were smart enough to pick their bridge QB because he fit the system rather than make adjustments to the system to fit the bridge QB. That would be a disservice to the players who are going to be part of the offense moving forward in 2025. As an aside I believe the GM/HC are smart enough. Heck the offense didn't really change with the backup QBs who played last season. We still threw it around.

#6 · Aug 28, 6:45 AM
BR
Joined May 2013
3 posts
Rep: 1
JR44 wrote:
I have a feeling they may be waiting for practice squads to be full, before announcing a new RB signing, which they will then need to release a current player on the 53 who I am sure they will want to make sure they get on the PS.  Gaskin has been added to the PS, but they are going to want 3 on the 53.

Can’t they elevate a PS player or two every week to the game day roster?  Not sure of the exact rules.

#7 · Aug 28, 7:37 AM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship RB room looks mighty empty right now...

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!