Forum The Longship Theo Jackson Extended

Theo Jackson Extended

JustInTime
Joined Feb 2025
2,818 posts
Rep: 1,806

It’s a movie

“Hell is empty and all the devils are here”

Shakespeare 

Liked:
#1 · Mar 6, 11:00 AM
StickierBuns
Joined May 2013
8,480 posts
Rep: 292
supafreak84 wrote:
I don't understand this at all. They are letting the one guy who most thought was a "must sign" for this team walk out the door? Bynum has been one of the better young safeties in the league and a leader on this defense. It makes even less sense if Harrison Smith is truly retired because I don't think you want to move Mattelus from that rover position.
I agree with this choice, I'm sure the team would have liked to keep him but can't pay a safety too much. Or you shouldn't. I'm one of the few on the board I think that never really thought Bynum was that good, more opportunistic than anything. JMO. Tough decisions now to benefit the grand plan.
edited Mar 6, 2025 7:10 PM CT
Liked:
#22 · Mar 6, 7:09 PM CT
MaroonBells
Joined Jan 2014
4,473 posts
Rep: 4,668
supafreak84 wrote:

And what top corner would that be? There's not a lot out there

At some point you have to pay the guys that have produced, especially when they are young core players, and does anybody disagree that Bynum has been a core player and leader for our defense? If we were up against the cap, maybe you could justify letting him walk...but not when you are one of the league leaders in cap space and it's an extremely weak crop of free agents as is. This would be one of the dumber decisions in free agency if it plays out

Reed, Ward, Douglas, Davis, Samuel, Hilton, Rodgers, Sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions...

"All those who believe in psychokinesis, raise my hand." —Steven Wright

Liked:
#23 · Mar 6, 7:14 PM CT
HO
Joined Apr 2024
426 posts
Rep: 485

I'm all for Jackson. Bynum and Murphy are going to get paid more than they are worth. Like Maroon said, paying money for CB's is money well spent. Although we do know Flores likes to use safeties like linebackers which gives them more value. Murphy has great ball skills but not great cover skills. Both Bynum and Murphy are going to get overpaid in free agency; hopefully not by the Vikings.

Liked:
#24 · Mar 6, 7:34 PM CT
supafreak84
Joined Jan 2014
1,591 posts
Rep: 1,507
MaroonBells wrote:

Reed, Ward, Douglas, Davis, Samuel, Hilton, Rodgers, Sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions...

I like Samuel but none of those guys are better players than our own guy Byron Murphy, so why not just spend the money on him? Guys like Bynum and Murphy are young, building block type players who have performed at a high level for your own organization. We've seen it first hand for several years. I don't understand what we are doing letting them out of the building. Bynum isn't going to get Winfield Jr money but he will probably come in around 15 million a year, which is reasonable considering what he means on and off the field. If it plays out thar he leaves along with Smith retiring, it's s bad move by the Kweef-meister.

Liked:
#25 · Mar 6, 8:32 PM CT
Bullazin
Joined Jul 2013
476 posts
Rep: 296

If I’m paying someone top of market, they need to be a prototype stud. Like them both but, Bynum, Murphy ain’t it.

NOW (prime)Harrison Smith? , Jets? Back up the truck.

It’s time for Jackson and Ward to play.

edited Mar 7, 2025 8:58 AM CT
Liked:
#26 · Mar 7, 8:46 AM CT
MaroonBells
Joined Jan 2014
4,473 posts
Rep: 4,668
supafreak84 wrote:

I like Samuel but none of those guys are better players than our own guy Byron Murphy, so why not just spend the money on him? Guys like Bynum and Murphy are young, building block type players who have performed at a high level for your own organization. We've seen it first hand for several years. I don't understand what we are doing letting them out of the building. Bynum isn't going to get Winfield Jr money but he will probably come in around 15 million a year, which is reasonable considering what he means on and off the field. If it plays out thar he leaves along with Smith retiring, it's s bad move by the Kweef-meister.

I think both Bynum and Murphy are good players whose production benefitted greatly from an opportunistic, attacking Flores defense, over-inflating their market value. I think most of us have been saying this for months, so there's no "we didn't sign him, so he sucks" retrofitting going on here. 

I hope we're still able to land Murphy on a reasonable deal. That's one less corner we need to add. But I think it would be a mistake to spend anything close to top-of-market money on him. Mostly I just want to see what the Vikings do at both positions in free agency and the draft before I join you on the "woe is us" bandwagon. Free agency hasn't even started yet.

"All those who believe in psychokinesis, raise my hand." —Steven Wright

Liked:
#27 · Mar 7, 9:38 AM CT
StickierBuns
Joined May 2013
8,480 posts
Rep: 292
comet52 wrote:
Word from the local beat writers over the last couple months has been Bynum is gone, Murphy is probably going to get more $ than the team is willing to spend.  None of it should be a big surprise and this point.  They want Murphy back but aren't going to throw financial discipline out the window regardless.
Yep, they are choosing to put the money into Murphy, not Bynum, which is fine with me but Murph will be overpaid. The team is very high on Mekhi Blackmon, he's going to get a starting corner spot.
Liked:
#28 · Mar 7, 9:50 AM CT
supafreak84
Joined Jan 2014
1,591 posts
Rep: 1,507
MaroonBells wrote:

I think both Bynum and Murphy are good players whose production benefitted greatly from an opportunistic, attacking Flores defense, over-inflating their market value. I think most of us have been saying this for months, so there's no "we didn't sign him, so he sucks" retrofitting going on here. 

I hope we're still able to land Murphy on a reasonable deal. That's one less corner we need to add. But I think it would be a mistake to spend anything close to top-of-market money on him. Mostly I just want to see what the Vikings do at both positions in free agency and the draft before I join you on the "woe is us" bandwagon. Free agency hasn't even started yet.

Bynum's been starting games for us since his rookie year and has played under 3 different coordinators. I thought he was one of the very few bright spots for us under "Easy" Ed Donatell. So I'll disagree that the Flores scheme inflated numbers or was the reason for his success. 

And nobody's on a "woe is us" bandwagon, but it's dumb to let young, productive players who are leaders in the locker room out of your own building when we finally have cap money available to bring them back, especially in a mostly putrid free agency crop league wide. Sign your own guys. Not saying to give him top 5 safety money, but he's played well under a rookie contract, earned a raise, and that should be in Minnesota.

Liked:
#29 · Mar 7, 10:47 AM CT
MA
Joined Apr 2024
641 posts
Rep: 1,464
supafreak84 wrote:

Bynum's been starting games for us since his rookie year and has played under 3 different coordinators. I thought he was one of the very few bright spots for us under "Easy" Ed Donatell. So I'll disagree that the Flores scheme inflated numbers or was the reason for his success. 

And nobody's on a "woe is us" bandwagon, but it's dumb to let young, productive players who are leaders in the locker room out of your own building when we finally have cap money available to bring them back, especially in a mostly putrid free agency crop league wide. Sign your own guys. Not saying to give him top 5 safety money, but he's played well under a rookie contract, earned a raise, and that should be in Minnesota.

That's just it, I think Bynum DOES want top of the market safety money.  I don't disagree, I'd love to have Bynum back since he's a good player and great locker room guy.  But paying him top of the market safety money isn't a smart investment in terms of roster construction.

Liked:
#30 · Mar 7, 11:21 AM CT
supafreak84
Joined Jan 2014
1,591 posts
Rep: 1,507
MAD GAINZ wrote:

That's just it, I think Bynum DOES want top of the market safety money.  I don't disagree, I'd love to have Bynum back since he's a good player and great locker room guy.  But paying him top of the market safety money isn't a smart investment in terms of roster construction.

Well everybody does, but what justification would he have to demand 20+ million a season? Pro-Bowls..no, All Pro teams...no, playoff wins..no,  but for the Vikings he's an important piece to the defense and a leader in the prime of his career. You don't let guys like that leave the building and create roster holes where there doesn't need to be any. I'd feel much better about letting him walk if I knew Harrison Smith was coming back, but as of now, that doesn't appear to be the case.

Liked:
#31 · Mar 7, 12:55 PM CT
JustInTime
Joined Feb 2025
2,818 posts
Rep: 1,806
supafreak84 wrote:

I like Samuel but none of those guys are better players than our own guy Byron Murphy, so why not just spend the money on him? Guys like Bynum and Murphy are young, building block type players who have performed at a high level for your own organization. We've seen it first hand for several years. I don't understand what we are doing letting them out of the building. Bynum isn't going to get Winfield Jr money but he will probably come in around 15 million a year, which is reasonable considering what he means on and off the field. If it plays out thar he leaves along with Smith retiring, it's s bad move by the Kweef-meister.

So, Sauce isn’t better than Murphy. 

Hokay

“Hell is empty and all the devils are here”

Shakespeare 

Liked:
#32 · Mar 7, 12:56 PM CT
supafreak84
Joined Jan 2014
1,591 posts
Rep: 1,507
JustInTime wrote:

So, Sauce isn’t better than Murphy. 

Hokay

No, but Sause is available? News to me..

Now I'm reading some Viking beat writer from the Athletic is reporting there's a "very high likelihood" Harrison Smith comes back for another year. If this is the case, then I'll feel a little better about Bynum leaving

edited Mar 7, 2025 1:20 PM CT
Liked:
#33 · Mar 7, 12:59 PM CT
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship Theo Jackson Extended
Return to top ↑

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!

You belong here, Vikings fan.

Join the VikeFans community to share your takes, react to posts, and talk Vikings with fans who get it.