Quote: @Skodin said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ SFVikeFan said:
@ greediron said:
@ SFVikeFan said:
@ greediron said:
@ SFVikeFan said:
@ greediron said:
Bill gates invented computers? Now that is about as rich as AlGr inventing the internet. But call everyone imbeciles. Brilliant.
Gates donates tons of money, but he is also outspoken about population control. So his donations often come with strings.
Two months ago you were singing a different tune about Gates and how the virus and a possible vaccine were all money making hoaxes by Gates and Fauci.
You said “follow the money”.
What happened?
what happened indeed. Did you lose your ability to follow the bouncing ball? I contested the notion he invented computers. And that his donations come with strings attached.
I love how you seek arguments out of thin air. And why I normally don't bother responding to your claims. I will go back to normal now.
I seek arguments out of thin air?
No, you make wild claims of conspiracy theories out of thin air - like you previously claimed that Gates is using the virus situation as a money grab - but then you never bring any facts to back it up.
When I point out your lack of facts to support your claims, you normally don’t respond, because you don’t like being asked to actually prove anything you claim because heaven forbid you might find out you’re wrong.
So you followed the money trail and bouncing ball and what happened? By all means share with us how a guy who gives away more money than anyone in the world, is out to make money and sacrifice lives to do it because clearly that’s his priority ...
How about you do me a favor and just ignore me. I think you are about as unreasonable as they come when discussing politics, so I have no interest in even discussing it with you. You seem intent on baiting and creating issue where there isn't any. So just put me on ignore and the world will be spared many unread pixels.
I forgot it’s soooooo unreasonable to ask people to cite sources when they trot out claims of conspriacy theories, I mean talk about baiting someone ....
What's the point when the sources are then summarily dismissed for any number of reasons?
Like Greed said, maybe it's time to walk away for a while.
wait what?
because sources can be called out therefore there is no need to have to present them?
some of those reasons are called facts.
we need people to present their ideas, beliefs, cases, with their eveidence so we as a collective can decide whose voices are legitmate and whom should be dismissed.
who wants a subjective post modern philosophical world? With no citations, everything and nothing can be facts
That is chaos
Knock it off. Nobody wants facts. Facts have a well known liberal bias. Americans just want verification of our own personal truths.
Quote: @MaroonBells said:
@ Skodin said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ SFVikeFan said:
@ greediron said:
@ SFVikeFan said:
@ greediron said:
@ SFVikeFan said:
@ greediron said:
Bill gates invented computers? Now that is about as rich as AlGr inventing the internet. But call everyone imbeciles. Brilliant.
Gates donates tons of money, but he is also outspoken about population control. So his donations often come with strings.
Two months ago you were singing a different tune about Gates and how the virus and a possible vaccine were all money making hoaxes by Gates and Fauci.
You said “follow the money”.
What happened?
what happened indeed. Did you lose your ability to follow the bouncing ball? I contested the notion he invented computers. And that his donations come with strings attached.
I love how you seek arguments out of thin air. And why I normally don't bother responding to your claims. I will go back to normal now.
I seek arguments out of thin air?
No, you make wild claims of conspiracy theories out of thin air - like you previously claimed that Gates is using the virus situation as a money grab - but then you never bring any facts to back it up.
When I point out your lack of facts to support your claims, you normally don’t respond, because you don’t like being asked to actually prove anything you claim because heaven forbid you might find out you’re wrong.
So you followed the money trail and bouncing ball and what happened? By all means share with us how a guy who gives away more money than anyone in the world, is out to make money and sacrifice lives to do it because clearly that’s his priority ...
How about you do me a favor and just ignore me. I think you are about as unreasonable as they come when discussing politics, so I have no interest in even discussing it with you. You seem intent on baiting and creating issue where there isn't any. So just put me on ignore and the world will be spared many unread pixels.
I forgot it’s soooooo unreasonable to ask people to cite sources when they trot out claims of conspriacy theories, I mean talk about baiting someone ....
What's the point when the sources are then summarily dismissed for any number of reasons?
Like Greed said, maybe it's time to walk away for a while.
wait what?
because sources can be called out therefore there is no need to have to present them?
some of those reasons are called facts.
we need people to present their ideas, beliefs, cases, with their eveidence so we as a collective can decide whose voices are legitmate and whom should be dismissed.
who wants a subjective post modern philosophical world? With no citations, everything and nothing can be facts
That is chaos
Knock it off. Nobody wants facts. Facts have a well known liberal bias. Americans just want verification of our own personal truths.
Facts is a funny word, facts sounds like indisputable proven truth, but that doesnt stop people from proving counter facts on here daily, so thanks for the bait post, but you know damn well that everyone disputes "facts" and sources here daily and that we could find factual sources to support about any position we wanted to make.
Quote: @MaroonBells said:
Knock it off. Nobody wants facts. Facts have a well known liberal bias. Americans just want verification of our own personal truths.
Said the guy quoting falsehoods. But I do agree with your last sentence. Seems quite fitting when considering your third sentence, just because you repeat it doesn't make it true.
Quote: @MaroonBells said:
@ Skodin said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ SFVikeFan said:
@ greediron said:
@ SFVikeFan said:
@ greediron said:
@ SFVikeFan said:
@ greediron said:
Bill gates invented computers? Now that is about as rich as AlGr inventing the internet. But call everyone imbeciles. Brilliant.
Gates donates tons of money, but he is also outspoken about population control. So his donations often come with strings.
Two months ago you were singing a different tune about Gates and how the virus and a possible vaccine were all money making hoaxes by Gates and Fauci.
You said “follow the money”.
What happened?
what happened indeed. Did you lose your ability to follow the bouncing ball? I contested the notion he invented computers. And that his donations come with strings attached.
I love how you seek arguments out of thin air. And why I normally don't bother responding to your claims. I will go back to normal now.
I seek arguments out of thin air?
No, you make wild claims of conspiracy theories out of thin air - like you previously claimed that Gates is using the virus situation as a money grab - but then you never bring any facts to back it up.
When I point out your lack of facts to support your claims, you normally don’t respond, because you don’t like being asked to actually prove anything you claim because heaven forbid you might find out you’re wrong.
So you followed the money trail and bouncing ball and what happened? By all means share with us how a guy who gives away more money than anyone in the world, is out to make money and sacrifice lives to do it because clearly that’s his priority ...
How about you do me a favor and just ignore me. I think you are about as unreasonable as they come when discussing politics, so I have no interest in even discussing it with you. You seem intent on baiting and creating issue where there isn't any. So just put me on ignore and the world will be spared many unread pixels.
I forgot it’s soooooo unreasonable to ask people to cite sources when they trot out claims of conspriacy theories, I mean talk about baiting someone ....
What's the point when the sources are then summarily dismissed for any number of reasons?
Like Greed said, maybe it's time to walk away for a while.
wait what?
because sources can be called out therefore there is no need to have to present them?
some of those reasons are called facts.
we need people to present their ideas, beliefs, cases, with their eveidence so we as a collective can decide whose voices are legitmate and whom should be dismissed.
who wants a subjective post modern philosophical world? With no citations, everything and nothing can be facts
That is chaos
Knock it off. Nobody wants facts. Facts have a well known liberal bias. Americans just want verification of our own personal truths.
Facts don't have a liberal bias. All people want their own viewpoints confirmed, regardless of facts. The left wanders down their conspiracy theories as much as anyone else.
Quote: @greediron said:
@ MaroonBells said:
Knock it off. Nobody wants facts. Facts have a well known liberal bias. Americans just want verification of our own personal truths.
Said the guy quoting falsehoods. But I do agree with your last sentence. Seems quite fitting when considering your third sentence, just because you repeat it doesn't make it true.
Not that I care, but I'm curious now, what falsehood?
That Bill Gates has spent 30 years of his life and $50 billion dollars supporting humanitarian causes? That he has pledged 90% of his remaining money to charity? That the people who start Youtube conspiracies have the comprehension of a fucking potato? Or that people who believe them are scientifically illiterate fucking imbeciles?
So you don't actually read what other people write. Good to know. Carry on. It was your post that started this. Start there and read this time.
Quote: @medaille said:
@ MaroonBells said:
@ Skodin said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ SFVikeFan said:
@ greediron said:
@ SFVikeFan said:
@ greediron said:
@ SFVikeFan said:
@ greediron said:
Bill gates invented computers? Now that is about as rich as AlGr inventing the internet. But call everyone imbeciles. Brilliant.
Gates donates tons of money, but he is also outspoken about population control. So his donations often come with strings.
Two months ago you were singing a different tune about Gates and how the virus and a possible vaccine were all money making hoaxes by Gates and Fauci.
You said “follow the money”.
What happened?
what happened indeed. Did you lose your ability to follow the bouncing ball? I contested the notion he invented computers. And that his donations come with strings attached.
I love how you seek arguments out of thin air. And why I normally don't bother responding to your claims. I will go back to normal now.
I seek arguments out of thin air?
No, you make wild claims of conspiracy theories out of thin air - like you previously claimed that Gates is using the virus situation as a money grab - but then you never bring any facts to back it up.
When I point out your lack of facts to support your claims, you normally don’t respond, because you don’t like being asked to actually prove anything you claim because heaven forbid you might find out you’re wrong.
So you followed the money trail and bouncing ball and what happened? By all means share with us how a guy who gives away more money than anyone in the world, is out to make money and sacrifice lives to do it because clearly that’s his priority ...
How about you do me a favor and just ignore me. I think you are about as unreasonable as they come when discussing politics, so I have no interest in even discussing it with you. You seem intent on baiting and creating issue where there isn't any. So just put me on ignore and the world will be spared many unread pixels.
I forgot it’s soooooo unreasonable to ask people to cite sources when they trot out claims of conspriacy theories, I mean talk about baiting someone ....
What's the point when the sources are then summarily dismissed for any number of reasons?
Like Greed said, maybe it's time to walk away for a while.
wait what?
because sources can be called out therefore there is no need to have to present them?
some of those reasons are called facts.
we need people to present their ideas, beliefs, cases, with their eveidence so we as a collective can decide whose voices are legitmate and whom should be dismissed.
who wants a subjective post modern philosophical world? With no citations, everything and nothing can be facts
That is chaos
Knock it off. Nobody wants facts. Facts have a well known liberal bias. Americans just want verification of our own personal truths. The left wanders down their conspiracy theories as much as anyone else.
You know that's not true, so why do you say it?
The left had a few back in the Bush days, but nothing even close to what we see now with the Deep State, QAnon, Alex Jones, Sandy Hook, crisis actors, birthers, Soros, all the hoaxes...99% of it is right wing. And there's a reason for that. Conservatives, because they're conservatives, don't trust anyone, especially government, but also science, media, etc. You combine a lack of trust with an abundance of information and you have fertile ground for being seduced by the perception of secrecy... the whispers of "what aren't we being told?"
Quote: @greediron said:
So you don't actually read what other people write. Good to know. Carry on. It was your post that started this. Start there and read this time.
This can't be about the computer thing? The guy wrote "imbeciles that are using the very computers you pretty much invented in the first place." Is that what has your knickers in a knot? What are you, 80? You know what "pretty much" means, right? It means not. I'm pretty much done for the day, which means I'm not done for the day. I've pretty much lived in Denver my whole life, which means I haven't lived in Denver my whole life. It's a writing style thing. I could translate it for someone of your generation. "Pert'near." He pert'near invented the damn things, wouldn't ya say? Which means he didn't, but every one of us are staring at bytes and bits and code and flashes of light with his name on it.
Jiminy Crickets, Greed! What a silly post. I can't believe I responded to it. Assuming that's even what you're talking about. But I am pretty much done for the day.
|
