Yesterday, 08:23 AM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 08:27 AM by StickierBuns.)
(Yesterday, 08:19 AM)MaroonBells Wrote: I agree, it's unlikely Sam is going to replicate what he did in Minnesota for another team. But he doesn't have to. That will not be the expectation. The hope for a team who signs him will be that he's on a new course and he continues developing. Plus, I don't think teams believe it was all system and weapons in Minnesota. Darnold learned a lot about playing QB from O'Connell and his staff. Still, Sam's new team would be wise to try to achieve some continuity for him by bringing over some of those pieces.
Also, I think the concerns you mention are already baked into Sam's value. Most people are talking a Baker-like deal (3 years, $100M). That is not a salary befitting at 27yo QB with 14 wins 4300 yards and 35 TDs. $100M for a QB is a pittance. It would rank 19th among NFL QBs.
Sure, Titans might choose to keep developing Levis, although I tend to think they've seen enough. But have you looked at the QB depth charts for the Raiders, Giants, Steelers, Jets, Browns? And the QBs available in free agency and draft? Yuck.
The huge temptation for a few teams with Darnold will be: no draft compensation probably in a trade or very little, a weak QB class in the Draft and Darnold is only 27 years old. I think the Raiders and Steelers are going to be very interested and vice versa.