+- VikeFans.com (https://vikefans.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Forums (https://vikefans.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: The Longship (https://vikefans.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Thread: Long Term Deal Unlikely For Cousins (/showthread.php?tid=89)
Long Term Deal Unlikely For Cousins - JustinTime18™ - 06-27-2017
Kirk Cousins - QB - Redskins
ESPN's Adam Cousins reports a long-term deal between the Redskins and franchise-tagged Kirk Cousins "is considered a long shot for the time being."NFL Network analyst and former GM Charley Casserly agrees, saying he does not "see any way" the two sides reach a long-term deal. There was some optimism about a new deal earlier this month -- Schefter does say there is "an improved tone between the two sides" -- but it seems like the July 17 deadline will pass without an agreement. Cousins is scheduled to make $23.94 million on the one-year franchise tender.
Long Term Deal Unlikely For Cousins - Guest - 06-27-2017
Wait..... are Adam Cousins and Kirk Cousins... cousins?? I mean I know they are Cousins, but are they cousins?
Long Term Deal Unlikely For Cousins - Guest - 06-27-2017
This deal with Cousins and the Redskins has been interesting to watch: have you ever seen a franchise so begrudgingly and reluctantly try and secure a QB to a long term contract? LOL. Its like they know they probably can't do any better currently yet he's not lighting the world on fire, either.
Long Term Deal Unlikely For Cousins - Guest - 06-27-2017
Maybe they like a QB coming up in next years draft. Lord (can I say that...) knows there are some good ones coming out.
Long Term Deal Unlikely For Cousins - Guest - 06-27-2017
I'd bet that "He DOESN'T like that!!!"
Thanks...I'm here all week
Long Term Deal Unlikely For Cousins - Guest - 06-27-2017
It’s still too early to come to any conclusions on Kirk CousinsPosted by Mike Florio on June 27, 2017, 5:09 PM EDT
![[Image: 630131440-e1498597770755.jpg?w=215]](https://nbcprofootballtalk.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/630131440-e1498597770755.jpg?w=215)
Getty ImagesThe never ending news cycle abhors a vacuum. So when nothing is going on generally, specific situations in which nothing is going on get dusted off from time to time. Enter the Kirk Cousinssituation, which periodically will become the focal point of #breakingnews as the true pay-or-get-off-the-pot moment arrives.As noted last week, anything said about Cousins is “noise” for now, and nothing is going on between himself and the team. The question becomes whether breakthroughs happen as the July 17 deadline approaches.
The safer guess at this point is that a deal won’t get done, primarily because Washington has done nothing over the past two years to show a willingness to get a deal done on the player’s terms. With Cousins now having more leverage than ever, it’s unlikely that Washington will throw great money after good, given the annual missed opportunities to extend Cousins for much less than it would cost now.
In this regard, last week’s Derek Carr contract means nothing. The numbers for Cousins are and have been simple; he has $23.94 million in hand for 2017, and for 2018 he’ll have: (1) $34.47 million under the franchise tag; (2) $28.7 million under the transition tag; or (3) a clear shot at the open market. Coupled with the $19.95 million Cousins earned a year ago, he holds all the cards when it comes to cobbling together a long-term deal based on 2017 and 2018.
Absent a sudden decision by Cousins to make a concession against his leverage or an epiphany by Washington that causes the team to forget that it could have had Cousins for less a year ago and even less in 2015, stubbornness and pride will keep the clock ticking toward Washington having to spend even more to keep Cousins — or watching him walk away.
Either way, the answer won’t come until at least two weeks from now. And if a deal isn’t done, don’t be shocked if Washington leaks the last offer rejected by Cousins, since the magnitude of the number in comparison to the stature of Cousins will make the team seem reasonable and fair, and the player neither.
Share this: