+- VikeFans.com (https://vikefans.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Forums (https://vikefans.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: The Longship (https://vikefans.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Thread: SI.com's post free agency power rankings (/showthread.php?tid=20579)
Pages:
1
2
SI.com's post free agency power rankings - StickierBuns - 04-11-2025
https://www.si.com/nfl/nfl-post-free-agency-power-rankings-bills-challenge-eagles
RE: SI.com's post free agency power rankings - JustInTime - 04-11-2025
6th with an unproven QB.
RE: SI.com's post free agency power rankings - Canthony - 04-11-2025
I think it is time to get over the Rodgers talk already. He seems to be waiting on us, but when Jones came out to talk highly of him, that was kinda the dagger for me on that thought.
RE: SI.com's post free agency power rankings - purplefaithful - 04-11-2025
(04-11-2025, 09:09 AM)Canthony Wrote: I think it is time to get over the Rodgers talk already. He seems to be waiting on us, but when Jones came out to talk highly of him, that was kinda the dagger for me on that thought.
Yah, Rogers to MN is lazy journalism. I think it gives pundits a dopamine rush to write about it.
6 is too high for me to predict for MN right now with a big question at QB.
7 too high for GB. I dont have a good handle on GB going into 25 but that seems high.
I see Commodes at the 5 or 6 spot and an off year for Chiefs; that SB hangover should be a doozey.
RE: SI.com's post free agency power rankings - StickierBuns - 04-11-2025
The media's undying and never ending love for Green Bay always amazes me. Chicago should have beaten them twice last year.
RE: SI.com's post free agency power rankings - MaroonBells - 04-11-2025
(04-11-2025, 09:35 AM)StickierBuns Wrote: The media's undying and never ending love for Green Bay always amazes me. Chicago should have beaten them twice last year.
Vikings won three more games than the Packers last year and beat them twice. Since then, the Vikings have added a ridiculous free agent class (best in the NFL and an A+ according to PFF) and the Packers have done next to nothing (C-). So unless you think JJM is a massive downgrade from Darnold (I don't), the Vikings appear to be in much better shape than the Packers. For the Vikings it's all about JJ McCarthy.
RE: SI.com's post free agency power rankings - Montana Tom - 04-11-2025
Just saw something this morning that the Rodgers to Vikings possibility has eroded to close to zero. (Good!)
Right now, these projections are pure bull*hit and are just a little bit of red meat to throw to us ravenous fans looking for any nuggets.
We each could do our own rankings and each come up with something different for the Top 10 with varying justifications.
I do agree with MB, in that our ridiculously talented FA class looks to have bolstered our biggest weaknesses and that JJM is probably not going to be a downgrade from Darnold. The ball bounces funny, so it is difficulty to forecast with any degree of accuracy.
Bottom line: I do not agree with where Conor Orr (the SI writer) placed us at #6, and definitely agree that the Packers are ranked too high.
RE: SI.com's post free agency power rankings - Mattyman - 04-11-2025
Lions 3#
Vikings #6
Green Bay #7
Bears #18
hmmm........
RE: SI.com's post free agency power rankings - hogjowlsjohnny - 04-11-2025
I liked the number 6 ranking though thought it was a bit premature and generous. But when I saw Green Bay ranked 7th, I knew he didn't know what he was talking about. Green Bay is simple. They missed with their franchise QB!
RE: SI.com's post free agency power rankings - Vikergirl - 04-12-2025
6th because of Aaron Rodgers nonsense. I am sick and tired of hearing about him and want him to go away. It's JJM time