+- VikeFans.com (https://vikefans.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Forums (https://vikefans.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Sensitive Topics (https://vikefans.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Thread: CNN admits on tape Russia is bullspit ( edit to remove obscenity) (/showthread.php?tid=71)
CNN admits on tape Russia is bullspit ( edit to remove obscenity) - Guest - 07-12-2017
LMAO. Did he get any info?
Get off the Russian story. It's clear what really happened.
CNN admits on tape Russia is bullspit ( edit to remove obscenity) - Guest - 07-12-2017
seriously this is a bunch of shit. the DNC rigs their election among their own voter base... they werent trying to dupe the evil republicans, or even sway the swing voting independents... they were cheating to defraud their own voter base and here we have the dem voters crying about the other guys not upholding the integrity of the voting process... seriously...you cant make this shit up. apparently the hypocrisy knows no bounds.
CNN admits on tape Russia is bullspit ( edit to remove obscenity) - Guest - 07-12-2017
Boy, another Russia story for all the dum-dums to go all in on.
I'm sure it will turn out differently from the other 206 Russia stories the dum-dums have chosen to go all in on.
CNN admits on tape Russia is bullspit ( edit to remove obscenity) - Guest - 07-13-2017
Quote: @C.M. Funk said:Be nice please. Pretty mild but it escalates quickly.
Boy, another Russia story for all the dum-dums to go all in on.
I'm sure it will turn out differently from the other 206 Russia stories the dum-dums have chosen to go all in on.
CNN admits on tape Russia is bullspit ( edit to remove obscenity) - Guest - 08-12-2017
The über-left blogzine The Nation, has put the final nail in the coffin of the Trump/Russia question.
https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new-report-raises-big-questions-about-last-years-dnc-hack/
Pull quote(s):
Their work is intricate and continues at a kinetic pace as we speak. But its certain results so far are two, simply stated, and freighted with implications:
- There was no hack of the Democratic National Committee’s system on July 5 last year—not by the Russians, not by anyone else. Hard science now demonstrates it was a leak—a download executed locally with a memory key or a similarly portable data-storage device. In short, it was an inside job by someone with access to the DNC’s system. This casts serious doubt on the initial “hack,” as alleged, that led to the very consequential publication of a large store of documents on WikiLeaks last summer.
- Forensic investigations of documents made public two weeks prior to the July 5 leak by the person or entity known as Guccifer 2.0 show that they were fraudulent: Before Guccifer posted them they were adulterated by cutting and pasting them into a blank template that had Russian as its default language. Guccifer took responsibility on June 15 for an intrusion the DNC reported on June 14 and professed to be a WikiLeaks source—claims essential to the official narrative implicating Russia in what was soon cast as an extensive hacking operation. To put the point simply, forensic science now devastates this narrative.
One, there are many other allegations implicating Russians in the 2016 political process. The work I will now report upon does not purport to prove or disprove any of them. Who delivered documents to WikiLeaks? Who was responsible for the “phishing” operation penetrating John Podesta’s e-mail in March 2016? We do not know the answers to such questions. It is entirely possible, indeed, that the answers we deserve and must demand could turn out to be multiple: One thing happened in one case, another thing in another. The new work done on the mid-June and July 5 events bears upon all else in only one respect. We are now on notice: Given that we now stand face to face with very considerable cases of duplicity, it is imperative that all official accounts of these many events be subject to rigorously skeptical questioning. Do we even know that John Podesta’s e-mail address was in fact “phished”? What evidence of this has been produced? Such rock-bottom questions as these must now be posed in all other cases.
Two, houses built on sand and made of cards are bound to collapse, and there can be no surprise that the one resting atop the “hack theory,” as we can call the prevailing wisdom on the DNC events, appears to be in the process of doing so. Neither is there anything far-fetched in a reversal of the truth of this magnitude. American history is replete with similar cases. The Spanish sank the Maine in Havana harbor in February 1898. Iran’s Mossadegh was a Communist. Guatemala’s Árbenz represented a Communist threat to the United States. Vietnam’s Ho Chi Minh was a Soviet puppet. The Sandinistas were Communists. The truth of the Maine, a war and a revolution in between, took a century to find the light of day, whereupon the official story disintegrated. We can do better now. It is an odd sensation to live through one of these episodes, especially one as big as Russiagate. But its place atop a long line of precedents can no longer be disputed.
Forensic investigators, prominent among them people with decades’ experience at high levels in our national-security institutions, have put a body of evidence on a table previously left empty.
Three, regardless of what one may think about the investigations and conclusions I will now outline—and, as noted, these investigations continue—there is a bottom line attaching to them. We can even call it a red line. Under no circumstance can it be acceptable that the relevant authorities—the National Security Agency, the Justice Department (via the Federal Bureau of Investigation), and the Central Intelligence Agency—leave these new findings without reply. Not credibly, in any case. Forensic investigators, prominent among them people with decades’ experience at high levels in these very institutions, have put a body of evidence on a table previously left empty. Silence now, should it ensue, cannot be written down as an admission of duplicity, but it will come very close to one.It requires no elaboration to apply the above point to the corporate media, which have been flaccidly satisfied with official explanations of the DNC matter from the start.